THE MEN AND WOMEN HOLDING|
POSITIONS OF AUTHORITY IN
THE HOAX GOVERNMENTS OF CANADA
AND THE IMPOSTOR CROWN OF CANADA
ARE COMMITTING HIGH TREASON
AGAINST THE CANADIAN PEOPLE
Posted: March 1st, 2002
Latest update: Sep 2011
Thomas Jefferson wrote in the USA Declaration of Independence:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
It is obvious that Jefferson gained his inspiration from:
Virginia Declaration of Rights (June 12, 1776) Drafted by: George Mason
Article I: That all men are by nature equally free and independent, and have certain inherent rights, of which, when they enter into a state of society, they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their posterity; namely, the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety.
It should be noted here that the primary unalienable (meaning: a value cannot be ascertained) right is 'life'. The secondary unalienable rights are 'property' and 'liberty'. 'Property' is absolutely necessary for the maintenance of life - the maintenance of one's body. One's primary property is one's labour - mental and/or physical. 'Liberty' is absolutely necessary to take one's produce to market - to travel to one's place of work where labour, the primary property, may be exchanged for the necessary property to maintain life - food, shelter and clothing.
The 'Pursuit of Happiness' (Hope for Happiness - as an attainable objective) is vital for one's mental and physical health.
Notice that Jefferson 'conveniently' left the property right out of the Declaration of Independence. Modern charters of rights use the term 'security of person'.
Since 'person' is a legal status (corporate slave status) attached to one's body, the statement is meaningless relative to rights.
That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, [yet, you will find that 'MAN, MEN - regardless of sex, are NEVER mentioned in any Government legislation, Acts statutes or laws, at any level of Government.]
Article II: That all power is vested in, and consequently derived from, the people; ['persons' is not the plural of 'people', nor are 'persons' people] that magistrates are their trustees and servants, and at all times amenable to them.
Article III: That government is, or ought to be, instituted for the common benefit, protection, and security of the people, nation or community; of all the various modes and forms of government that is best, which is capable of producing the greatest degree of happiness and safety and is most effectually secured against the danger of maladministration; and that, whenever any government shall be found inadequate or contrary to these purposes, a majority of the community hath an indubitable, unalienable, and indefeasible right to reform, alter or abolish it, in such manner as shall be judged most conducive to the public weal.
That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.
But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.
Declaration of Independence
Virginia Declaration of Rights 1776
Conclusion drawn from the above quote:
1. We, the People, the free will 'living' adult men and women of Canada (or the USA) are creations of God - NOT creations of government.
From the 1893 Dictionary of Law:
2. The RIGHTS of LIFE, LIBERTY, PROPERTY and the PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS are bestowed upon us by our Creator - NOT by Government.
3. We, the People create Government and install kings, queens, prime ministers or presidents as our servant.
4. As creator of Government, we are the "MAJESTY", and government is our servant.
5. When the men and women, acting as members of a SERVANT Government, scheme to overthrow the "MAJESTY" of the MASTER and subjugate or destroy the SOVEREIGN PEOPLE, there exists the crime of HIGH TREASON.
6. The Canadian People have NOT had one iota of opportunity to participate in deciding whether we will have the Monarch of Great Britain as the Crown of Canada, what form of government we will have in Canada, or any opportunity to write or ratify a constitution.
NOTE: I have added the term 'living' in item #1 above, as it has come to light that the English Parliament, in a deceptive act in 1666, during the Fire of London, legislated an Act, called the CESTUI QUE TRUST Act (ses-tee kay), wherein all humans in England over the age of 7 years were declared legally dead (lost at sea). This allowed the incorporated CROWN to claim all of the English people (physical bodies) as owned property, and allowed the subsequent deceits necessary to also claim the minds of Englishmen as owned property of the Crown. This scheme continued on into the British Empire and later Commonwealth. How minds have been claimed is addressed below.
Treason. Betrayal, treachery, breach of faith or allegiance.
Treason may exist only as between allies: it is a general appellation to denote not only offenses against the king and government, but also accumulation of guilt which arises whenever a superior reposes a confidence in a subject or inferior, between whom and himself there subsists a natural, a civil, or even a spiritual relation, and the inferior so abuses that confidence, so forgets the obligations of duty, subjugation, and allegiance, as to destroy the life of the superior.
When disloyalty attacks majesty itself it is called, by way of distinction, high treason, equivalent to the 'crimen loesoe majestatis' of the Romans.
High treason is the most heinous civil crime a man can commit. If indeterminate, this alone is sufficient to make a government degenerate into arbitrary power.
The Treasonous Acts Against Canadians
The Canadian Governments, at all levels, by use of a "STRAWMAN", a sound alike
name of the name by which you have been called all your life, but usually spelled
in all capital letters or family name first, and called a "PERSON". The deceit is
in the government's (Crown) making the family name as the paramount name, a "surname",
where the root word "sur" means over, above, primary, and the given name(s) as a
reference name. This is opposite to the intentions of one's parents, and opposite
of the origin and status of a "family" name - that being a reference name for the
primary, or given names for the child. That fraudulent name is then inscribed on a government
money value instrument called a 'birth certificate'.
In one's using/acknowledging the birth certificate name as being "one and the same" as oneself, that fraud
intended name, it carries with its use, the status of 'plantation slave'. An adult
living man (male or female) cannot have a name as an identification in that we are
minds within an earthen vessel, and a mind is not a physical thing to identify.
It can only have an 'appellation' - a term or sound that gets the mind's attention
through the various physical senses. Thus, we use the Crown owned legal name under
necessity as our agent in commerce, our communication device to communicate with
corporate Government and corporate businesses.
The 'all caps' spelling is a code signifying that the slave has been pledged
as a debtor in the bankruptcy of the Crown. All western nations were declared
bankrupt in 1930. The deceit by government in teaching people to use the birth
certificate name through the educational system makes all Canadians SUBJECT to
the CROWN by changing our status to that of a FEUDAL SERF of the MIDDLE AGES.
For several hundred years, the British Monarchy bestowed 'privileges' (falsely
called rights) on 'subjects' (sometimes called 'citizens'), but this ceased with
the 1930 bankruptcy.
Since that time, these 'privileges', including 'due process of law' has been
slowly removed, and the 'slaves' have been subjected to increased forced
extraction of their labour and life (life is time spent) by way of taxation and
inflation of fiat counterfeit money. This is how people have been deprived of
the protections of such documents as the Magna Carta 1225, the Habeas Corpus Act,
the Bill of Rights, The Petition of Rights, and more recently, Diefenbaker's
Canadian Bill of Rights.
The Romans had an expression for disobedient slaves, called "homo sacer",
where the disobedient slave was deprived of all rights of due process of law.
The disobedient slave could be murdered at will by "officers of Caesar" without
any reprisal, just as modern police can murder people with their guns or tasers
without fear of criminal justice, based upon their own testimony of right.
This is a deliberate act of HIGH TREASON against the People of Canada, as it
results in the loss of the Creator bestowed rights of LIFE, LIBERTY and PROPERTY,
and the right to a common law court (due process of law).
Queen Elizabeth II has allowed her name to be prostituted to this evil scheme
in direct violation of her oath of office as Monarch of the British Commonwealth
of Nations. In her oath, she swore on the Holy Bible that she would uphold and
defend the rights of the People over which she reigns as Monarch. Thus, it is apparent
that she follows the Talmudic Law of Kol Nidre, where the primary oath is always
paramount over any subsequent oath taken. In the case of the Monarchs of Great Britain,
they are, by the Treaty of 1213 between King John and the Pontiff of Rome, required
to make an oath or pledge of fealty or vassalage to the Pontiff of Rome (a secular,
and not religious pledge or oath) of obedience and servitude to Papal policy. In
the video of her coronation and oath taking, Queen Elizabeth II is shown signing the
document that pledges her obligation to obey the verbal coronation oath. However,
her signing the document at the top, rather than at the bottom negated any obligation
required of the pledge/oath stated below in the document.
There is also a question as to whether the Monarch of the United Kingdom of Great
Britain and Ireland has any right to be called the Monarch or the Crown of
Canada, as the right to succession in the BNA Act (section 2) granted to the
successors and heirs of Queen Victoria was struck by the British Imperial
Parliament in 1893.
Any claim of absolute sovereignty rights by the English Monarchy was shown to
be non-existent in the Magna Carta of 1215. [Actually 1225, as the 1215 Magna
Carta was voided by the Pope.] Yet, over PERSONS, be they natural persons (man
under contract of servitude with the Crown, and without right of free will -
except for obedience) or artificial corporate bodies, as created by the Crown,
there is absolute rights of the MASTER over the servant exhibited by the Crown
over the People.
The Crown, whether it be in so-called right of Canada or of a province, by
deviously changing our status before their corrupt courts as being corporate
members created by the Crown, has deprived us of our lawful courts and plundered
our lives which have been expended in labour to obtain the very necessities of
In ALL cases in a court in Canada, where Canadians are taken to court for
disobedience to a statute, or regulation therein, they are considered a
'CORPORATE ENTITY/NATURAL PERSON/MEMBER'. This fact is an unknown to most
Canadians. People believe that they are dealing directly with the Canadian
Justice system as a full liability man or woman with full rights.
England has been under the Roman system since King John signed over England
FOREVER as a vassal state to the Holy Roman Empire/Pontiff/Vatican in 1213. Then,
in 1297, King Edward I and the Pope incorporated the Crown of England as a sub-corporation
of the British Crown, the corporate Crown of the City of London. The shortened
version of the Magna Carta (1297), with its 'free man' converted to 'freeman (serf), was
made the first statute of the newly formed English corporate Government system.
All human institutions within the Roman/Vatican system are make-believe ships/
incorporations in the Roman system. Thus, All corporations and corporate (crew)members
are a legal fiction, and are SUBJECTS of the Crown. The British Crown is subject to,
or under the Crown of the City of London, the Vatican owned financial, legal and
professional controls capitol of the Holy Roman Empire. So, the Crown referred to
in Canada is most likely the 6 pointed City of London Crown (a corporation), not
the English Crown.
The Canadian people have a basic RIGHT to true Common Law , and as such, are NOT
SUBJECTS of the Crown for the imposition of corporate ADMINISTRATIVE Law - the
ONLY type of law which is found in the Canadian Court system. English Common Law
is merely a camoflaged version of Roman Civil Law designed for 'debtor States of
the Roman system - Roman Municipal Law. This subterfuge is totally in the realm
of legal sleaze and trickery for the purpose of denying your God Given RIGHTS.
In using the term "Common Law", I refer to the Anglo-Saxon Common Law. The
English Monarchy began the defrauding of the English people of their individual
rights protecting Anglo-Saxon Common Law in a concerted effort by King Edward I
in conspiracy with the Pope of Rome sometime around 1300 AD. The term "common
law" and "English common law" was concocted as a fraud; and, is in fact, a
system derived directly from Roman civil law - commonly called "dictator's law".
As Roman Municipal Law, it points to Mercantile Law used against debtors, as
'municipal' means a debtor territory. Considering that Anglo-Saxon Common Law
period of England preceded the Norman Conquest of England by some 500 years, we
have evidence of this fraud posted on the Canadian Federal Justice website:
"The common law, which developed in Great Britain
after the Norman Conquest, was based on the decisions of judges in the royal
courts. It is called judge-made law because it is a system of rules based on
"precedent". Whenever a judge makes a decision that is to be legally enforced,
this decision becomes a precedent: a rule that will guide judges in making
subsequent decisions in similar cases. The common law is unique in the world
because it cannot be found in any "code" or "legislation"; it exists only in
past decisions. However, this also makes it flexible and adaptable to changing
The primary feature of Roman Municipal Law, a variation of Roman Civil Law,
[derived from Maritime Law], used by the deceitful English Monarchy, and it's
so-called justice system, was/is the "notwithstanding clause". The Monarchy
called this 'Equity'. This clause derives from the fact that Roman Law is based
upon all commercial and political organizations, in fact all human institutions,
being make-believe ships.
All 'ship's orders' - laws, rules and regulations concerning the ship, have
within them the necessary right and duty of the captain to disregard any such
rules or regulations when he deems it necessary for the 'good' of the ship. The
complete "flexible and adaptable" feature of so-called English or British common
law is nothing more than the common usage of the notwithstanding clause to
insure that the Crown's pleasures, prerogatives and privileges come before the
individual rights of the people.
Thomas Paine (1737-1809), the great American philosopher of man's individual
rights and freedoms, wrote in his book Rights Of Man (page 218): "Government by
precedent, without any regard to the principle of the precedent, is one of
the vilest systems that can be set up."
In Paine's day, government's primary reason for existence was the justice system.
We can see how "flexible and adaptable" this fraudulent English common law is
by the way Canadian and American judges use the Anti-Government Movement Guide Book to institute treasonous actions against Canadians (and Americans, as the case may be) when people use unalienable rights or statute and/or constitutional law to defend themselves against government extortion rackets.
So, What is my understanding regarding the nature of Anglo-Saxon Common Law?
The Anglo-Saxon Law had no Statutes, Acts, Rules, Regulations, Edicts, Precedents or Magistrates[Judges]. There was only ONE Law - "Do not unto others as you would not have others do unto you." A sheriff was administrator for keeping the peace, and jury assembly. He was then enforcer of jury decisions. The jury was selected from the community of other free will men [peers = equal in status]. The jury decided whether the accused, [or the accuser] was using his/her free will in a moral manner, basing their decision solely on the Golden Rule - God's Law. The assembled jury appointed
a foreman as the speaker and administrator.
As the above quote from the 1893 Dictionary of Law states: "High treason is the most heinous civil crime a man can commit. If indeterminate, this alone is sufficient to make a government degenerate into arbitrary power."
Government, bodies politic, are corporations wherein men in administrative positions supposedly have protection against the actions they do by the "corporate veil". All corporations are "make-believe" ships, based upon the Roman Empire system, which itself was based upon the ancient Persian model whereby the ship was the entity, and the men on board as crewmembers were non-volitional (non-free-will minded) body parts with only the duty to obey the captain's orders.
But, this make-believe corporate veil protection to do as they please is only a fictional game. Men (and women) who do damage to another while in a contract (oath of office) to be a servant to the People are full liable for their unlawful actions when it entails HIGH TREASON. The PENALTY for HIGH TREASON is DEATH BY HANGING - and that penalty is still in effect in Canada.
In the USA Supreme Court records, we find:
Whenever a judge acts where he/she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act or
acts of treason.
U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101
S.Ct. 471, 66 L.Ed.2d 392, 406 (1980);
Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821)
What's To Be Done??
I would suggest reading a Discourse on Voluntary Servitude
written by Éttiene de la Boétie of France around 1560.
To learn about legal rights of which you should become very aware, study:
My primary answer is the Magna Carta Kanata Project.
Treason doth never prosper. What's the reason?
For if it prosper, none dare call it treason!
Sir John Harrington 1561-1612.
Eldon G. Warman
Top of page
© DetaxCanada 2002 Thru 2012